Daddy Film School #7: Special Bonus 80s Horror Double Feature: GREMLINS (1984) & POLTERGEIST (1982)

My sister runs a horror fan podcast and website. I have been guest-hosting through a March-Madness-style tournament these past few weeks. Check us out here.

Charlie came to a recording, and his already budding love for scary movies became borderline obsessive.

To be fair, he has been attending Comic Cons and other nerd-fests with me for quite some time. Here he is at Philly’s Wizard Comic Con at age eight, compliments of Uncle Sean Bergin.

431842_578691192161207_1211717870_nMost certified nerds will tell you that super heroes are a gate-way drug to horror. Han Solo is only a parsec away from Ash Williams.

maxresdefault

This “monster magazine” from the 80s–in which Jason Voorhees & ET share the cover–proves the steepness of the slippery slope from children’s sci-fi to all out horror.

179-4

I, like many American young men, found horror through comics. My parents didn’t bat an eyelash at my Amazing Spiderman subscription, but at the comic book shop, I stumbled into my first Tales from the Crypt. That led to Vault of Horror. Then Weird magazine. Then Famous Monsters of Filmland. And before I knew it, Fangorias were stashed under my bed with the…um…well, you know…board games. *COUGH*

7999512536_35fddfa7f1

I was ten when I hung the above picture, possibly from this very magazine, on my wall (next to Rowdy Roddy Piper).

My son and I are from very, very different generations. He catches fake monsters on walks through the neighborhood and has already (by 6th grade) had a relationship with a girl that lived and subsequently died, all through text messaging.

But Charlie and I share many interests, and the other day when he changed his cell phone wallpaper to the cover art for Poltergeist, it felt like a rite of passage I could relate to.  

***

CHARLIE WANTS TO WATCH HORROR MOVIES:

I put together a starter double feature:

GREMLINS 1984

Charlie asks, “If they can’t get it wet, why does the mom want to serve it chicken soup?”

And, “isn’t it always technically after midnight somewhere?”

This is my beta test. I decide that our foray into horror will stop here if Charlie is even a little freaked out.

He’s not. In fact, he is most disturbed by all the smoking. The adults smoke. The gremlins smoke. Everyone smokes.

Me: “That’s the 80s.”

Charlie: “Really?”

Me: “Yeah, most adults I knew smoked. You could smoke on an airplane.”

C: “Yeah, right.”

Me: “No. I’m 100% serious.”

C: “Stop. I’m not stupid. Where would the smoke go? That’s so dangerous. Stop.”

But he is entertained, and Gremlins magic holds up.

For the record, this is barely a horror movie. I mean, how many horror movies do you know of had their own picture book series? Happy Meal toys?

s-l300il_340x270-496598422_a7fj

 

Still, Gremlins has monsters, and people die. Well, presumably, only the teacher is a confirmed death, and no one seems too shaken up about that in the end. Maybe it’s because he’s the kind of guy who keeps kids in class on Christmas Eve then stays behind and uses public funds to do experiments on critters.

I worry over the Phoebe Cates creepy dead Santa dad story. I even consider fast-forwarding it, since it has no relevance to the plot whatsoever. I don’t, but Charlie is unphased. He just says, “What? Seriously?” And sort of scoffs.

For weeks, he walks around saying, “They’re watching Snow White, and they love it.”

POLTERGEIST 1982

Finn joins us for this one, then starts playing video games in the middle. He never makes it to either worrisome scene:

  1. Mr. Peeley Face (now THAT would’ve been a bad ass Happy Meal toy)
  2. skeletons in the pool (again)

THE DISCUSSION:

Charlie: I loved it. I love Spielberg movies. This twas a perfect balance. A little tiny bit gory, but mostly just really cool. I loved Zelda.

Finn: “Who? The little grandma?”

C: “She was so cool. Like Yoda, but real.”

F: “Who? The little grandma? She was scary Charlie Brown opera for sure.” (Note: Finn once used the term “scary Charlie Brown opera” to describe Nights on Broadway by the Bee Gees.)

C: “She’s not a grandma, Finn. Not all old ladies are grandmas.

F: “How do you know she isn’t a grandma?”

C: (moving on) “She and Nosferatu would be the perfect couple. Him…tall, vampire guy. She…tiny ghost exterminating lady.”

F: “Steven Spielberg is a scary man.”

C: “Steven Spielberg is the man.”

Me: “Why do you think Steven Spielberg is scary, Finn?”

F: “This, Jaws, that creepy alien guy with the wrinkly neck…”

Me: “E.T.? He’s not supposed to be scary.”

F: “He’s definitely a grandma.”

C: “E.T. is the scariest of them all. Finn’s got a point, there.”

F: “This movie wasn’t scary like Jaws, Dee Dee (me).”

Me: “What do you mean?”

F: “You know, when the angry fisherman guy was eaten, I cheered. He went down a little slide (editor’s note: boat shrapnel), and *GULP* (Finn makes a series of chomping noises to denote his satisfaction with man-eating sharks). I didn’t care about those guys. They were angry. They were grumpy. They were bad employers.”

Me: “Bad employers? Ok. So why was Poltergeist scarier? Because it was about a family?”

F: “Yea. These were kids! Kids dying? C’mon, Steve Spielberg.”

Me: “But the kids don’t die, Finn. Nobody dies in Poltergeist. Isn’t that weird? You still found it scarier.”

F: “Because I don’t care when fisherman guys die.”

Noted that I know more than just “fisherman guys” die in Jaws. In fact, a kid DOES die in Jaws. Still I understand Finn’s point. I go on to explain the profound truths he has uncovered. How we are all more frightened by relevant ideas. How Finn is explaining the dynamics of character development, the psychology of bonding that fiction writers exploit when developing horror. But before I can finish, they digress.

C: “Wow, Finn. You see? You know more about this than you think you do.”

F: “Dee Dee, there’s a kid in class who keeps farting.”

C: “Finn, you’re not even listening.”

F: “Charlie, I’m gonna push you into a trashcan. And then let the closet eat you. It’ll be the best day of my life.”

And…bed time.

No more horror for a while. Back to Westerns? I have High Noon on the DVR.

 

Daddy Film School #4: NOSFERATU (1922)

I seriously consider NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD. I even consult with fellow film teacher (and the current proprietor of my former website about film) Ed Clark. He tells me to go for it. He has no kids. I try this instead.

The previous film was Hitchcock. They wanted something scarier. I don’t want to tangle with their mother, though, who is adamant that this little experiment will scar them for life.

CHARLIE (11): “Silent?! Are you kidding me. Next thing you’re going to tell me it’s black and white!”

Meh.

THE WORRIES: Those kooky German expressionists & ol’ rat face himself. Too much? Nightmares of vampires riding man-eating sharks as the end of Daddy Film School?

nosferatu-0-0

BONUS: Good versions of this film are free on YouTube (see above).

As we watched, since we were at the desktop computer anyway, Charlie and I plan a Castle Dracula Halloween adventure we’ll never actually book.

This particular YouTube user soundtracks kills any chance at real terror. There’s a tasty vampire jazz to it. We call it “tasty high hat.” It’s impossible to feel scared while the music plays.

Also, we become hopelessly addicted to Nosferatu memes. Who wouldn’t? They’re delightful.

nosferatu-meme_fb_260156519byqu

Nosferatu becomes a recurring character in our family. We imagine his awkward adolescent years (“Imagine Nosferatu at a Chuck E. Cheese birthday party?”), blame him for occurrences (“Who left the refridgerator door open? NOSFERATU, you rascal!!!”) and even pantomime putting on his adorable Nosferatu hat.

11131466_gal

THE LESSONS: silent movies can be good…great even, a hint of the dominance of German expressionism, cool story about how the movie almost wasn’t because of public domain, PAs & Stoker’s widow. We even got into Bela Lugosi and the stage play that led to the Universal Dracula. We discuss the Count as the most ubiquitous fictitious character in history.

CHARLIE SAYS: “You wouldn’t expect a silent film to be scary, but this one was. Weird high hat jazz music whenever Nosferatu came on the screen, though. Daddy said this is probably not the right music. 3 stars. For it’s time, though, you know?”

FINN SAYS: “Gives me creepy nightmares. I’m not interested in this, honestly.” And he left, and it was all good. Before he left he pronounced the “H” in “honestly.”

Up Next: “Are there any other cool silent movies?”

Daddy Film School #3: TO CATCH A THIEF (1955)

THE KIDS ASKED: “Who are some other great directors?”

Hitchcock is a really great director.

Should I lie, and tell you I didn’t consider going right to PSYCHO? Back to back with JAWS? Mommy would’ve pulled the plug on Daddy Film School before it even got rolling.

This one was on Netflix, though.

THE WORRIES: Too boring? Too dated? Too much talking? Cary Grant too tan? Would they get the dated references?

To up the tension, I prepped the kids with the excellent “The Man from the South” episode of Alfred Hitchcock Presents as a primer. The kids loved Peter Lorre. They walked around exclaiming “Cahhhhllllos!” And…it turns out, Steve McQueen is cool, even when you don’t know who Steve McQueen is. But then just as life seems perfect…

FINN (9) ASKS: “Is this guy named after Lightning McQueen?” Sigh.

To Catch a Thief is a classically-paced Hitch films. That means, if you’re like me, you’ll appreciate the tense meandering and deadpan tone. If you’re my family, you’ll say it feels “long” and “not enough happens.”

Thank God Mom is only auditing the course. Still, this is a long swim from JAWS.

And there are some communication breakdowns. The kids are stunned (absolutely flabbergasted) when Grant threatens to put Kelly “over his knee.” And I am truly proud of social progress when they cannot even wrap their brains around this language, or even such a notion, being socially acceptable.

FINN SAYS: “Wait, is like, he really going to spank her? Spank her? Like he’s her dad or something? Is she a baby? She should sue him.” All valid points.

tocatchathief_1955_mp_hsb_1200_062320090414

We also spend a good amount of time on the term “cat thief.”

FINN: “So, he steals cats?”

ME: “No. It’s more like, he steals like a cat.”

FINN: “But cats don’t steal.”

ME: “Yeah, but, like, they’re…you know…sneaky-like.”

FINN: “Cats are sneaky?”

CHARLIE (11): “So he’s not going to steal cats?”

THE LESSONS WE LEARN:

  1. The movie teaches the kids how to watch a mystery. How it unfolds. Why it’s suspenseful. I realize that watching this movie tips them off to the old Hitchcockian “tweest” ending. This will come in handy, later.
  2. They appreciate the beautiful technicolor scenery. We discuss the innovation of color in film & television.
  3. Princess Kelly is a local, Ocean City, NJ, celebrity, so we learn about her at the historical society beforehand. gkkellyfam-1

CHARLIE SAY: “It was complex. I didn’t know what to think. I liked that. Cary Grant, I liked him. I thought he was like funny and a lovable guy. He was really clever. I liked what Daddy told us about Alfred Hitchcock. I liked seeing him on the bus. I want to know more about him. Where he started. 4 stars.”

Next Up: “Ok, so what about something suspenseful, but also scary?”

Daddy Film School #2: JAWS (1975)

We start with a splash! See what I did there?

I swore that the kids wouldn’t get scared. Then they got scared.

Thank God for the extra footage on YouTube and behind the scenes stuff. It tilted the terror to wonder. It’s a fine line from moaning to “how cool” with this age group.

I was guided by the notion that JAWS did not frighten me at all when I was younger. I was far too busy being afraid of more rational things. Like the widow down the street, abject embarrassment and this crap show who is somehow considered acceptable viewing for pre-schoolers.

hqdefault

Right? Gah.

Granted, my kids live at the beach, so maybe their fear is a tad more warranted than when I watched this movie as a grade-schooler in West New York, NJ.

THE LESSON: Spielberg was the man! “We’re gonna need a bigger shark.”

THE WORRY MOMENT: There’s more blood than I remember.

FINN (9): “What’s skinny dipping?”

ME: “Swimming with no clothes on.”

FINN: “Why would you do that?”

ME: “I don’t know. I don’t do that.”

CHARLIE (11): “Thank God!”

AN HOUR LATER:

FINN: “What was that called, ‘skin diving?’ I liked that. I like the skin diving.”

ME: (canceling plans for this blog’s existence)

maxresdefault

Beyond that though, the movie works it’s magic on them. It’s as big and fun as I remember it.

CHARLIE: “I like this movie a lot. It’s scary. I like that they made the shark’s presence scarier than its looks. Like (Daddy) said (the shark) didn’t work in the beginning, but they kept working on it. That was cool. I loved that it was scary even before we saw it. 4.5 stars.”

NEXT UP?: “Who are the other really great directors?”

 

Daddy Film School #1: The Beginning

I AM a former film teacher whose heart is still in the classroom.

In private, I yearn to “read scenes” and remind a captive audience that “shot selection IS story-telling.”

From seven years of teaching it, I know enough about film to know how little I really know about film. But I know I miss it…every day.

Luckily, I am a father of four. My older kids are aged 12 & 9. Charlie & Finn respectively. I also have twin five-year-olds, who will be spared this exercise (for now).

My children didn’t ask for this, but they come equipped with plenty of free time, bottomless curiosity and my own genetically pre-fixed palette. I plan to fill it…whether they like it or not…with wholesome, but not too wholesome, celluloid goodness.

TOGETHER, we’ll strive to create an epic monster of cataloged movie-watching that only a lifetime stuck together could yield…

THIS IS Daddy Film School, and here are the rules:

1. No movies traditionally considered “kid” or “family” movies.

2. No films from the past decade.

3. Each film included in our study will build on the previous film in some way. The boys will make the connections, ask the questions they want to explore… I will pick the movie that addresses their interest.

4. We will catalog and record the remarks of every movie we watch together, whether those comments are valid, worthwhile or even salient.

WHY?article-2138252-12e0b325000005dc-108_468x286

WHY NOT!

Film transforms young people, and does so more quickly than other media.

In film class, on Labor Day, students would tell me all about the personal impact Adam Sandler. One memorable student told me day one, “I don’t watch old movies like TITANIC.”

By Halloween, they’re realizing how little they know, but still complaining about “black and whites.” By Christmas they understand not only why Chaplin and Keaton are funny, but why they’re important. By Memorial Day they can explain the debt Scorsese owes Kurosawa. It’s magic, really.

I’m not trying to turn my kids into weirdos, art house hipsters or even film critics. But when a kid learns to find a comfortable spot on the corner of what is “good” and what they “like,” they just may love an art form forever.

And wouldn’t that kick ass?

Besides, who else is going to listen to all the useless crap I have in my head? They’ll still be plenty of time for Disney Channel original movies and The Avengers!

At the end of the day, remember, they’re my kids…they have no choice.

You, however, do have a choice. Hopefully, you join us anyway.